March Notes on the Antisymmetry of Syntax. Bernhard Rohrbacher. University of Pennsylvania. Follow this and additional works at. syntax came into its own as a tool for investigating and explaining typological variation 2″Antisymmetry and Japanese” () English Linguistics, syntax has no tools that can be used to analyze linear asymmetries (see . closer to answering the questions raised by Kayne’s antisymmetry.

Author: Juk Tygorr
Country: China
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 2 April 2006
Pages: 327
PDF File Size: 3.41 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.96 Mb
ISBN: 796-8-60186-423-8
Downloads: 26812
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Terr

AP 1 and AP 2 are both segments of a single category. According to Kayne’s Antisymmetry theory, there is no head-directionality parameter as such: Kayne’s theory also addresses the position of the specifier of a phrase.

Branching (linguistics)

In the present study two significant characteristics of pro-drop languages, i. The constituency-based structures are right-branching insofar as the non-head daughter is to the right of the head. In this way, the author gets two locally linear relations on nonterminals, i. A category excludes all categories not dominated by both its segments.

LINGUIST List 6.1651

The following structures demonstrate right-branching:. Kayne goes on atnisymmetry say, “This would lead to seeing my [ ] [10] arguments for binary branching to have two subcomponents, the first being the claim that syntax is n-ary branching with n having a single value, the second being that that value is 2. His explanation for the lack of wh-movement in Japanese is the most striking example of this.

Antisymmetry, then, janye to a universal Specifier-Head-Complement order. For other uses, see Antisymmetric disambiguation.

Antisymmetry – Wikipedia

The World Atlas of Language Structures. Here, at each phrasal level in turn, the head of the phrase moves from left to right position relative to its complement.


Each one of the relations has syntaax properties. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Kayne sums up the basic ideas of his theory and points out the advantages of the proposed representations. This implies according to the theory an ordering whereby probe comes before goal, i.

Kayne argues that a theory that allows both directionalities would imply an absence of asymmetries between languages, whereas kanyr fact languages are found not to be symmetrical in many respects. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Storage and Abtisymmetry in the Language Faculty. From the mids onwards, the standard analysis of wh-movement involved the wh-phrase moving leftward to a position on the left edge of the clause called [Spec,CP] i. Language universals and linguistic typology: The rules of the presented syntactic theory are applied to subword structure and the linear ordering of morphemes is considered.

This rejects the idea of an underlying ordering which is then subject to movement, as posited in the Antisymmetry theory and in certain other approaches. Reviewed by Milena Slavcheva, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences The monograph consists of ten chapters grouped in four parts. Antisymmetry as a principle of word order is reliant on assumptions that many theories of syntax [ which?

Retrieved from ” https: If phrases are always to be underlyingly head-initial, then a case like this must entail movement, since the particle comes after the verb phrase.

Branching (linguistics) – Wikipedia

A study of phrase structure. Relative clause extrapositon is reanalyzed as relative clause stranding. Retrieved from ” https: Structures in different languages, including the so called head-final languages, are derived in such a way that this generalization is preserved.

  FP0 C32T PDF

The Mon—Khmer and Austronesian languages of southeast Asia and many African languages come close to rigidly right-branching, with numerals as well as adjectives following their nouns and with degree words like verytooextremelyand quite following the adjectives they modify. Grammatically, there is not a significant difference between the sentence without VP-fronting a and the sentence where the VP moves to the matrix clause b.

Some languages are mostly right-branching head-initial. The example tree in the first section of this article is in accordance with X-bar theory with the exception that [Spec,CP] is treated as an adjunct.

Kayne proposes that the direction of the probe-goal search must share the direction of language parsing and production. The nature antisymmtery branching is most visible with full trees.

This distinction can have a profound impact on the overall nature of the theory of syntax. Kayne formulates in the form of linguistic universals the linear orderings of the main syntactic constituents.

For the property antisymmetrry matrices, see Skew-symmetric matrix. Chapter 6 deals with coordination. The definitions above may perhaps be thought to allow BP to c-command AP, but a c-command relation is not usually assumed to hold between two such categories, and for the purposes of antisymmetry, the question of whether BP c-commands AP is in fact moot.