Wiki for Collaborative Studies of Arts, Media and Humanities. 9. Mai Transcript of “Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels” – Guy Debord. Gliederung Einführung Inhalt Aktualität der kritischen Theorie in Bezug auf die. : Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels () by Guy Debord and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available.

Author: Togal Gohn
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 23 March 2013
Pages: 491
PDF File Size: 18.1 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.28 Mb
ISBN: 572-4-58279-398-4
Downloads: 50375
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Groll

Boorstin ‘s The Imagearguing that Boorstin missed the concept of Spectacle.

Part of the Politics series on. Levin Dismantling the Spectacle: The Society of the Spectacle French: Cover of the first edition.

When Debord says that “All that was once directly lived has become mere representation,” he is referring to the central importance of the image in contemporary society. The Society of the Spectacle. Eyerman took a series of photographs of geesellschaft audience wearing 3-D glasses.

Each thesis contains one paragraph. Socialism portal Communism portal Politics portal. Can Dialectics Break Bricks? Anonymity Concentration of media ownership Freedom of speech Media bias Privacy.

The Society of the Spectacle – Wikipedia

Retrieved from ” https: The growth of their real historical power goes together with a popularization of the possession of myth and illusion. Works Can Dialectics Break Bricks? The externality of the spectacle in relation to the active man appears in the fact that his own gestures are no longer his but those of another who represents them to him.

Wright Millsauthor of White Collar: In the Situationist view, situations are actively created moments characterized by “a sense of self-consciousness of existence within a particular environment or ambience”. Image at Getty Images: Thus, Debord ‘s fourth thesis is: Life magazine used one of the photographs as the cover of a brochure about the decade.


Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels – Guy Debord – Google Books

The Society of the Spectacle is a critique of contemporary consumer culture and commodity fetishismdealing with issues such as class alienationcultural homogenizationand mass media. Debord published a follow-up book Comments on gesellschadt Society of the Spectacle in This is why the spectator feels at home nowhere, because the spectacle is everywhere. Debord traces the development of a modern society in which authentic social life has been replaced with its representation: Council for Maintaining the Occupations.

Debord also draws an equivalence between the role of mass media marketing in the present and the role fuy religions in the past.

The Spectacle is “affirmation of all human lifenamely social life, as mere appearance” from thesis 6: This page was last edited on 4 Novemberat By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Consequently, social life moves further, leaving a state of “having” and proceeding into a debod of “appearing”; namely the appearance of the image.

Crowd manipulation Managing the news Media manipulation. Debord discusses at length Daniel J.

Being a star means specializing in the seemingly lived; the star is the object of identification with the shallow seeming life that has to compensate for the fragmented productive specializations which are actually lived. The meaning of words participates in the improvement. The book is considered a seminal text for the Situationist movement.

Guy Debord

In thesisDebord mentions some American sociologists who have described the general project of developed capitalism which “aims to recapture the fragmented worker as a personality well integrated in the group;” the examples mentioned by Debord are David Riesmanauthor of The Lonely Crowdand William H.

The book cover of the edition is derived from a photograph by the Life magazine photographer, J. Debord contends further that “the remains of religion and of the family the principal relic of the heritage of class power and the moral repression they assure, merge whenever the enjoyment of this world is affirmed—this world being nothing other than repressive pseudo-enjoyment.


Debord’s aim and proposal is “to wake up the spectator who has been drugged by spectacular images It embraces an author’s phrase, makes use of his expressions, erases a false idea, and replaces it with the right idea. But there they still preserve themselves in radical opposition to history.

Wikisource has original text related to this article: In a consumer society, social life is not about living, but about having; the spectacle uses the image to convey what people need and must have.

Le sens des mots y participe.

The work is a series of short theses in the form of aphorisms. The spectacle is the inverted image of society in which relations between commodities have supplanted relations between people, in which “passive identification with the spectacle supplants genuine activity”. These religions arose on the soil of history, and established themselves there.

Images, Debord says, have supplanted genuine human interaction. In Chapter 8, “Negation geselpschaft Consumption Within Culture”, Debord includes a critical analysis of the works of three American sociologists. In his analysis of the spectacular society, Debord notes that the quality of life is impoverished, [6] with such a lack of authenticity that human perceptions are affected, and an attendant degradation of knowledge, which in turn hinders critical thought.

The American Middle Classes.